{"id":36081,"date":"2020-09-04T15:34:13","date_gmt":"2020-09-04T13:34:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/?p=36081"},"modified":"2020-11-06T17:02:24","modified_gmt":"2020-11-06T16:02:24","slug":"ako-sa-branit-proti-znaleckemu-posudku","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/ako-sa-branit-proti-znaleckemu-posudku\/","title":{"rendered":"<\/i> Ako sa br\u00e1ni\u0165 proti znaleck\u00e9mu posudku?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Spolo\u010dnos\u0165 vedie spor, v ktorom protistrana predlo\u017eila znaleck\u00fd posudok. Je mo\u017en\u00e9 sa proti z\u00e1verom znaleck\u00e9ho posudku br\u00e1ni\u0165?<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/h6>\n

\u00c1no je<\/strong>. Znaleck\u00fd posudok je d\u00f4kaz ako ka\u017ed\u00fd in\u00fd<\/strong>, ku ktor\u00e9mu m\u00e1 strana sporu pr\u00e1vo vyjadri\u0165 sa. Okrem toho, znaleck\u00fd posudok vyprac\u00fava \u010dlovek, ktor\u00fd jednak nie je neomyln\u00fd a tie\u017e nemus\u00ed by\u0165 v\u017edy objekt\u00edvny, ke\u010f\u017ee je pomaly zau\u017e\u00edvanou praxou vypracova\u0165 posudok nie v z\u00e1ujme zistenia skuto\u010dn\u00e9ho stavu veci, ale v z\u00e1ujme o\u010dak\u00e1van\u00ed zad\u00e1vate\u013ea posudku.<\/p>\n

<\/h6>\n

Znaleck\u00fd posudok je d\u00f4kazom v spore, ktor\u00fd pom\u00e1ha sudcovi n\u00e1js\u0165 objekt\u00edvnu pravdu o relevantn\u00fdch skutkov\u00fdch okolnostiach<\/strong> sporu a to za pomoci odborn\u00fdch znalost\u00ed znalca. T\u00fdmto je vyjadren\u00fd \u00fa\u010del znaleck\u00e9ho posudku v spore a s\u00edce prispie\u0165 k\u00a0<\/strong> zisteniu objekt\u00edvneho skutkov\u00e9ho stavu veci. Ak<\/strong> konkr\u00e9tny znaleck\u00fd posudok predlo\u017een\u00fd v spore tento z\u00e1kladn\u00fd \u00fa\u010del nesp\u013a\u0148a, je vo svojej podstate zbyto\u010dn\u00fd<\/strong> a s\u00fad by na\u0148 ako na d\u00f4kaz nemal prihliada\u0165. V ka\u017edom pr\u00edpade je vhodn\u00e9 pozornos\u0165 s\u00fadu na to upriami\u0165.<\/p>\n

<\/h6>\n

\u010ealej je potrebn\u00e9 si uvedomi\u0165 o ak\u00fd typ znaleck\u00e9ho posudku<\/strong> ide. \u010ci ide o posudok, spr\u00e1vnos\u0165 z\u00e1verov ktor\u00e9ho sa d\u00e1 objekt\u00edvne overi\u0165 alebo o posudok, ktor\u00e9ho z\u00e1very s\u00fa len pravdepodobn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

<\/h6>\n

O znaleck\u00fd posudok spr\u00e1vnos\u0165 z\u00e1verov ktor\u00e9ho sa d\u00e1 objekt\u00edvne overi\u0165<\/strong> ide napr\u00edklad v pr\u00edpade znaleck\u00e9ho posudku na ur\u010denie hodnoty obchodn\u00e9ho podielu. Znalec pri v\u00fdpo\u010dte vych\u00e1dza z objekt\u00edvnych \u00fa\u010dtovn\u00fdch podkladov a pri spr\u00e1vnom pou\u017eit\u00ed spr\u00e1vne zvolenej met\u00f3dy ur\u010denia hodnoty obchodn\u00e9ho podielu, dospeje k\u00a0<\/strong> spr\u00e1vnemu v\u00fdsledku. \u010ci znalec pou\u017eil spr\u00e1vnu met\u00f3du, alebo \u010di spr\u00e1vnu met\u00f3du spr\u00e1vne aplikoval, je za pou\u017eitia logick\u00e9ho \u00fasudku mo\u017en\u00e9 sp\u00e4tne overi\u0165, ke\u010f\u017ee postup, ako znalec dospel k v\u00fdsledku, mus\u00ed by\u0165 v znaleckom posudku uveden\u00fd. Pokia\u013e v\u00a0<\/strong> znaleckom posudku postup znalca ch\u00fdba a nie je mo\u017en\u00e9 z\u00e1very overi\u0165, na tak\u00fdto znaleck\u00fd posudok by s\u00fad nemal prihliada\u0165, ke\u010f\u017ee je nepresk\u00famate\u013en\u00fd.<\/p>\n

<\/h6>\n

In\u00e1 by bola situ\u00e1cia v pr\u00edpade znaleck\u00e9ho posudku, ktor\u00e9ho z\u00e1very s\u00fa len pravdepodobn\u00e9<\/strong> a nie je z povahy veci mo\u017en\u00e9 spr\u00e1vnos\u0165 z\u00e1veru overi\u0165. V t\u00fdchto pr\u00edpadoch by z\u00e1very znaleck\u00e9ho posudku mali by\u0165 uveden\u00e9 ako pravdepodobn\u00e9. Je chybou znaleck\u00e9ho posudku, ak znalec napriek tomu, \u017ee z\u00e1very m\u00f4\u017eu by\u0165 len pravdepodobn\u00e9, vyslov\u00ed kategorick\u00fd z\u00e1ver. V pr\u00edpade znaleck\u00e9ho posudku, ktor\u00e9ho z\u00e1very s\u00fa len pravdepodobn\u00e9, jeho spr\u00e1vnos\u0165 mo\u017eno hodnoti\u0165 pod\u013ea jeho presved\u010divosti<\/strong>. Mohlo by sa javi\u0165, \u017ee presved\u010divos\u0165 znaleck\u00e9ho posudku je subjekt\u00edvnou kateg\u00f3riu poznania. Do ur\u010ditej miery je, av\u0161ak existuje ur\u010dit\u00e1 hranica, za\u00a0<\/strong> ktorou ka\u017ed\u00fd primerane informovan\u00fd a rozumn\u00fd \u010dlovek by musel v konkr\u00e9tnom pr\u00edpade dospie\u0165 k tomu, \u017ee z\u00e1very znaleck\u00e9ho posudku s\u00fa zjavne neobjekt\u00edvne.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Spolo\u010dnos\u0165 vedie spor, v ktorom protistrana predlo\u017eila znaleck\u00fd posudok. Je mo\u017en\u00e9 sa proti z\u00e1verom znaleck\u00e9ho posudku br\u00e1ni\u0165? …<\/h3>","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":36356,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51],"tags":[],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36081"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36081"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36081\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}