{"id":34805,"date":"2018-07-23T12:25:49","date_gmt":"2018-07-23T10:25:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/?p=34805"},"modified":"2018-07-31T10:22:19","modified_gmt":"2018-07-31T08:22:19","slug":"navrhovana-novela-obcianskeho-zakonnik","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/navrhovana-novela-obcianskeho-zakonnik\/","title":{"rendered":"<\/i> Navrhovan\u00e1 novela Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR predlo\u017eilo do medzirezortn\u00e9ho pripomienkov\u00e9ho konania novelu Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka<\/strong> v\u00a0reakci\u00ed na n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00e9ho s\u00fadu SR, sp. zn.\u00a0 PL. \u00daS 11\/2016-60. T\u00fdmto n\u00e1lezom \u00dastavn\u00fd s\u00fad SR rozhodol, \u017ee ustanovenie \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona \u010d. 250\/2007 Z. z. o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea <\/strong>a\u00a0o\u00a0zmene z\u00e1kona Slovenskej n\u00e1rodnej rady \u010d. 372\/1990 Zb. o\u00a0priestupkoch v\u00a0znen\u00ed neskor\u0161\u00edch predpisov nie je v\u00a0s\u00falade s\u00a0 \u00dastavou SR.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pod\u013ea d\u00f4vodovej spr\u00e1vy je cie\u013eom<\/strong> tejto novely zavedenie osobitnej \u00fapravy uplat\u0148ovania preml\u010dan\u00fdch n\u00e1rokov zo spotrebite\u013esk\u00fdch zml\u00fav a\u00a0ich zabezpe\u010denia<\/strong>. Novelou sa navrhuje vlo\u017ei\u0165 do Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka nov\u00e9 ustanovenie \u00a7 54a: \u201ePreml\u010dan\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo zo spotrebite\u013eskej zmluvy nemo\u017eno vym\u00e1ha\u0165 a ani ho platne zabezpe\u010di\u0165<\/em>.\u201c<\/strong> To znamen\u00e1, \u017ee subjekt\u00edvne majetkov\u00e9 pr\u00e1va zo spotrebite\u013eskej zmluvy sa po uplynut\u00ed preml\u010dacej doby stan\u00fa ex lege<\/em> natur\u00e1lnou oblig\u00e1ciou bez potreby vznesenia n\u00e1mietky preml\u010dania v\u00a0zmysle ustanovenia \u00a7 100 ods. 1 Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka. \u00a0Teda preml\u010dan\u00fd n\u00e1rok zo spotrebite\u013eskej zmluvy nie je mo\u017en\u00e9 vym\u00e1ha\u0165 dostupn\u00fdmi prostriedkami a\u00a0je len na vlastnom uv\u00e1\u017een\u00ed povinnej zmluvnej strany, \u010di spln\u00ed n\u00e1rok druhej zmluvnej strane.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

V\u00a0porovnan\u00ed s\u00a0vy\u0161\u0161ie spomenut\u00fdm ustanoven\u00edm \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea v\u0161ak navrhovate\u013e, zrejme aj z\u00a0obavy napadnutia aj tohto ustanovenia na \u00dastavnom s\u00fade SR, vz\u0165ahuje t\u00fato zmenu z\u00e1kona na obe strany spotrebite\u013esk\u00e9ho vz\u0165ahu, na spotrebite\u013ea aj na dod\u00e1vate\u013ea<\/strong>. Pod\u013ea n\u00e1\u0161ho n\u00e1zoru v\u0161ak z\u00a0kontextu vypl\u00fdva, \u017ee t\u00e1to navrhovan\u00e1 \u00faprava je ur\u010den\u00e1 predov\u0161etk\u00fdm na ochranu spotrebite\u013ea a\u00a0nie dod\u00e1vate\u013ea, podobne ako to bolo v\u00a0pr\u00edpade ustanovenia \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pod\u013ea ustanovenia \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea: \u201eOrg\u00e1n rozhoduj\u00faci o n\u00e1rokoch zo spotrebite\u013eskej zmluvy prihliada aj bez n\u00e1vrhu na nemo\u017enos\u0165 uplatnenia pr\u00e1va, na oslabenie n\u00e1roku pred\u00e1vaj\u00faceho vo\u010di spotrebite\u013eovi, vr\u00e1tane jeho preml\u010dania alebo na in\u00fa z\u00e1konn\u00fa prek\u00e1\u017eku alebo z\u00e1konn\u00fd d\u00f4vod, ktor\u00e9 br\u00e1nia uplatni\u0165 alebo prizna\u0165 plnenie pred\u00e1vaj\u00faceho vo\u010di spotrebite\u013eovi, aj ke\u010f by inak bolo potrebn\u00e9, aby sa spotrebite\u013e t\u00fdchto skuto\u010dnost\u00ed dovol\u00e1val.<\/em>\u201c T\u00e1to \u00faprava bola od za\u010diatku odbornou verejnos\u0165ou prijat\u00e1 s\u00a0viacer\u00fdmi v\u00fdhradami a sved\u010dalo proti nej viacero argumentov. Najz\u00e1sadnej\u0161ie vyznievali jednostrann\u00e9 zv\u00fdhod\u0148ovanie spotrebite\u013ea ako dl\u017en\u00edka a neprimeran\u00fd odklon od nestrannosti s\u00fadu. S\u00a0t\u00fdm sa stoto\u017enil aj \u00dastavn\u00fd s\u00fad SR, ktor\u00fd nes\u00falad \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea od\u00f4vodnil viacer\u00fdmi \u00fastavne sporn\u00fdmi komponentmi tejto normy v\u00a0ich s\u00fa\u010dte, \u010do u\u017e nie je v\u00a0s\u00falade s\u00a0princ\u00edpom pr\u00e1vnej istoty ako jednej zo zlo\u017eiek pr\u00e1vneho \u0161t\u00e1tu. Pod\u013ea \u00dastavn\u00e9ho s\u00fadu SR tak bol poru\u0161en\u00fd aj princ\u00edp legality ako komponent procesnej f\u00e9rovosti.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

V\u00a0zmysle vy\u0161\u0161ie uveden\u00e9ho pod\u013ea n\u00e1s nie je vyl\u00fa\u010den\u00e9, \u017ee predlo\u017een\u00e1 novela Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka, ak ju N\u00e1rodn\u00e1 rada SR schv\u00e1li, neskon\u010d\u00ed podobne ako spom\u00ednan\u00e9 ustanovenie \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea. Mysl\u00edme si, \u017ee sledovan\u00fd cie\u013e pr\u00e1vnej \u00fapravy by sa dal dosiahnu\u0165 aj miernej\u0161\u00edmi sp\u00f4sobmi a\u00a0tak\u00e1to plo\u0161n\u00e1 \u00faprava nie je vhodn\u00e1, podobne ako v\u00a0pr\u00edpade \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pod\u013ea prechodn\u00e9ho ustanovenia sa touto novelou maj\u00fa spravova\u0165 aj pr\u00e1vne vz\u0165ahy vzniknut\u00e9 pred \u00fa\u010dinnos\u0165ou tejto novely<\/strong>. Z\u00a0d\u00f4vodu, \u017ee predkladan\u00e1 novela m\u00e1 napravi\u0165 stav po vyhl\u00e1sen\u00ed \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea za nes\u00faladn\u00fd s\u00a0\u00dastavou SR, predkladate\u013e navrhuje jej \u00fa\u010dinnos\u0165 odo d\u0148a vyhl\u00e1senia.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR predlo\u017eilo do medzirezortn\u00e9ho pripomienkov\u00e9ho konania novelu Ob\u010dianskeho z\u00e1konn\u00edka v\u00a0reakci\u00ed na n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00e9ho s\u00fadu SR, sp. zn.\u00a0 PL. \u00daS 11\/2016-60. T\u00fdmto n\u00e1lezom \u00dastavn\u00fd s\u00fad SR rozhodol, \u017ee ustanovenie \u00a7 5b z\u00e1kona \u010d. 250\/2007 Z. z. o\u00a0ochrane spotrebite\u013ea a\u00a0o\u00a0zmene z\u00e1kona Slovenskej n\u00e1rodnej rady \u010d. 372\/1990 Zb. o\u00a0priestupkoch v\u00a0znen\u00ed neskor\u0161\u00edch…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[47],"tags":[],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34805"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34805"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34805\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.krivak.sk\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}